Fictional protagonists who state that their race is superior to their allies aren't likable, right? (Don't give me that bull about letting authors write whatever they want; if they really could, the Twilight series wouldn't be so hated.)

You've managed to combine three all-inclusive, unsubstantiated comments, none of which are correct. It's difficult to know what you're seeking. If you like to add a query we'll try to answer.

Clearly some protagonists will consider their own race to be superior. There are so many such characters who are not only likable, but admirable.. Zainal, the Cattenai from Anne McCaffrey's Freedom series, comes immediately to mind.

"Twilight" is hated? By whom? I don't think its many fans would agree with you.

An author's diversity is "crap"? Any author who created only characters of one particular type would be failing in his task, and would bore his readers spitless. A character with the flawless abilities of Sir Galahad or the hagiographic demeanour of a Jesus Christ, would be unbelievable, boring, and almost intolerably irritating.

So, what is your point?

It ain't bull, man. They can write whatever they want, so such series exist. Hatred about them doesn't have anything to do with being able to write stuff.

Given your obsession with asking this question - you really need to seek psychiatric counseling.